Introduction Today I thought I'd talk about a neat design pattern that doesn't seem to get much love: In its fullest form it's also sometimes called the Prototype Pattern.
Posted on November 30, by Scott Alexander I. If the world was created by the Invisible Hand, who is good, how did it come to contain so much that is evil?
Can he expect to get rich? No — if Google stock was underpriced ie you could easily get rich by buying Google stockthen everyone smart enough to notice would buy it. As everyone tried to buy it, the price would go up until it was no longer underpriced.
Big Wall Street banks have people who are at least as smart as your uncle, and who will notice before he does whether stocks are underpriced. The city has lots of skilled Thai chefs and good access to low-priced Thai ingredients. With the certainty of physical law, we can know that city will have a Thai restaurant.
Maybe the city government banned Thai restaurants for some reason? We can take this beyond money-making into any competitive or potentially-competitive field.
There are thousands of research biologists who would like a Nobel Prize. But go too far with this kind of logic, and you start accidentally proving that nothing can be bad anywhere.
Suppose you thought that modern science was brokenwith scientists and grantmakers doing a bad job of focusing their discoveries on truly interesting and important things. But if this were true, then you or anyone else with a little money could set up a non-broken science, make many more discoveries than everyone else, get more Nobel Prizes, earn more money from all your patents and inventions, and eventually become so prestigious and rich that everyone else admits you were right and switches to doing science your way.
There are dozens of government bodies, private institutions, and universities that could do this kind of thing if they wanted. But none of them have. All the sick people would go to them, they would make lots of money, investors would trip over each other to fund their expansion into new markets, and eventually they would take over health care and be super rich.
But if lots of people want better mass transit and are willing to pay for it, this is a great money-making opportunity. Entrepreneurs are pretty smart, so they would notice this money-making opportunity, raise some funds from equally-observant venture capitalists, make a better mass transit system, and get really rich off of all the tickets.
But nobody has done this.
No doctor had any good ideas about what to do at this point. Eliezer did some digging, found that existing light boxes were still way less bright than the sun, and jury-rigged a much brighter version. A friend told Eliezer that the professionals at the Bank surely knew more than he did.
But after a few years, the Bank of Japan switched policies, the Japanese economy instantly improved, and now the consensus position is that the original policies were deeply flawed in exactly the way Eliezer and others thought they were. You would expect it to just not work at all.
In previous years, I would use the case of central-line infections as my go-to example of medical inadequacy. Some babies have malformed digestive systems and need to have nutrient fluid pumped directly into their veins. The nutrient fluid formula used in the US has the wrong kinds of lipids in it, and about a third of babies who get it die of brain or liver damage.
But the only FDA-approved nutrient fluid formula is the one with the wrong lipids, so we just keep giving it to babies, and they just keep dying. Eliezer draws on the economics literature to propose three main categories of solution: I shall, somewhat arbitrarily, sort these concepts into three larger categories: Cases where the decision lies in the hands of people who would gain little personally, or lose out personally, if they did what was necessary to help someone else; 2.
Systems that are broken in multiple places so that no one actor can make them better, even though, in principle, some magically coordinated action could move to a new stable state.
The first way evil enters the world is when there is no way for people who notice a mistake to benefit from correcting it. For example, Eliezer and his friends sometimes joke about how really stupid Uber-for-puppies style startups are overvalued.
The people investing in these startups are making a mistake big enough for ordinary people like Eliezer to notice.Store and Retrieve Information, NVQ Level 2 Essay Unit: Store and Retrieve Information Learning Outcome 1: Understand processes and procedures for storing and retrieving information - Explain the purpose of storing and retrieving required information The main purpose of storing information is for easy retrieval in the future when it is.
A report by BAE Systems and SWIFT shows that financial market areas such as equities trading, bonds, and derivatives face more threats than banking, forex, and trade finance. You will get $40 trillion just by reading this essay and understanding what it says.
For complete details, see below. (It’s true that authors will do just about anything to . Essay on NVQ level 2; Essay on NVQ level 2.
Words May 29th, 22 Pages. • The level of detail you are able to store • The choice to have various copies of the information in case of loss and ease of transfer. Be Able To Research Information for Others Agree aims, objectives and deadlines for the information search Agreeing.
Businesses can store a vast quantity of information that needs to be used on a day to day basis, storing the wrong information is a waste of company time and funds. Therefore the purpose of confirming the information to be . Nov 20, · Hi guys, Right, i am doing an Apprenticeship in Business Admin, doing unit - Store and retrieve information.
My question is within this unit, i am currently struggling to get an answer to this question. What is the purpose of storing and retrieving required information? I don't understand, as the reason is because you need plombier-nemours.com: Resolved.